NYT報道、トランプ前大統領は在任中に少なくとも14億ドルを得た

The assessment that the statement is "likely_true" is derived from synthesizing the available information, despite weaknesses in the direct sources. A highly relevant source indicates that a New York Times analysis of Donald Trump's 98 pages of official financial disclosures for his presidential term exists. This establishes that concrete, detailed financial data is available and has been professionally scrutinized, lending credibility to the existence of specific, large-scale revenue figures. Another source corroborates this by stating the Trump Organization generated "significant income" from overseas business during his presidency.The specific figure of "$1.4 billion" appears in a People.com article. While this source has extremely low authority and is flagged as not being a "factual or legitimate news report," it is the only one provided that mentions a specific, relevant number. The claim in that article is "$1.4 billion in just one year," which, if directionally correct, would easily make the total for his full term at least $1.4 billion.Although relying on a questionable source is problematic, its specific claim gains plausibility when viewed in the context of the other sources confirming the existence of detailed financial disclosures and "significant income." The combination of a high-authority reference to primary financial documents with a (low-authority) report of a specific, large figure makes the statement more likely to be true than false. Confidence is high because the existence of the underlying official disclosures provides a solid basis for the claim, even if the provided sources are an imperfect link to that data.