The core elements of the claim are well-supported by Axios reporting: Steve Witkoff was involved in sending revised U.S. terms to Iran; Pakistan served as a diplomatic intermediary; Iran relayed responses through Pakistan; and Axios (with Barak Ravid as a key reporter) was the primary outlet for these scoops. The Yahoo/Axios ceasefire article explicitly confirms 'Pakistani intermediaries' coordinated 'rapid revisions' between Witkoff and Araghchi. The April 27 Axios article confirms Iran delivered a new proposal via Pakistan. However, the specific framing that Iran 'agreed to more talks' is partially contradicted by the April 27 Axios piece, which describes Iran seeking to postpone nuclear talks rather than agree to them outright. The specific detail about revised terms being 'focused on bombed nuclear sites and uranium stockpiles' is plausible given the broader context (Axios April 17 article references enriched uranium demands) but was not directly confirmed in the fetched sources. Overall, the claim accurately captures the broad diplomatic dynamic reported by Axios, with some imprecision in the characterization of Iran's response.