Flow在390万美元攻击后修订恢复计划,避免回滚

The evidence strongly supports the statement that Flow revised its recovery plan to avoid a rollback. Multiple highly relevant sources directly confirm this. One source from Binance explicitly states the implemented recovery plan includes "No rollback." Another from Cryptorank reports that the Flow Foundation "rejected a full network rollback" and chose an alternative "isolated node recovery." Several other credible sources, including articles from The Block and Coinpaper, provide the necessary context by confirming that there was an initial, controversial plan to perform a rollback to undo the $3.9 million exploit. These sources do not contradict the statement; they simply report on an earlier stage of the incident before the plan was revised. They establish that a rollback plan existed, which is a necessary precondition for it to be "revised." There is no conflicting evidence among the relevant sources. The narrative is consistent: an exploit occurred, a rollback was initially proposed, and then this plan was revised to avoid the rollback. Two sources are completely irrelevant and have been disregarded.