Polymarket拒绝支付276万美元委内瑞拉入侵预测赔付

The statement is well-supported by multiple, highly relevant sources. The core claim that Polymarket disputed a payout related to a 'US Invasion of Venezuela' market is corroborated by several sources. One source reports that Polymarket was 'arguing against settling bets' on such a market, and another explicitly states Polymarket was 'refusing to settle bets'.The most critical part of the claim, the specific '$2.76 million' figure, is directly confirmed by a highly relevant source which cites reporting from the crypto news outlet BlockBeats. This specificity lends significant weight to the statement's truthfulness.There is a minor contradiction from one source that mentions a figure of 'over $10 million' for the same market dispute. However, this does not necessarily invalidate the statement. It's plausible that the '$10 million' refers to the total size of the prediction market pool, while the '$2.76 million' represents the specific payout amount for the winning side that was being contested. The source providing the $2.76 million figure appears to be citing a more specialized, crypto-focused news outlet, making it more likely to have the precise financial detail correct.Irrelevant sources discussing different markets (e.g., Maduro's capture, an invasion of Cuba) do not detract from the strong, direct evidence provided. Overall, the evidence strongly indicates that a dispute over a payout for this specific market occurred, and the $2.76 million figure is explicitly mentioned in the most relevant source.