The assessment is based on strong, consistent, and direct evidence. The most compelling piece of evidence is a primary source document from the official U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC.gov) website. This document is the written input from the Solana Policy Institute itself to the SEC's Crypto Task Force, where it directly addresses the need for legal protections for developers of non-custodial software. This high-authority primary source directly validates the statement.This evidence is further corroborated by multiple secondary sources. A news report from Binance Square and social media posts from the reputable crypto news outlet The Block both explicitly state that the Solana Policy Institute has called for stronger legal protections for software developers, often in the context of the Tornado Cash and Roman Storm legal cases. While these are secondary sources with lower authority than the SEC document, their consistency across different platforms strengthens the claim.Additionally, a joint letter to the FTC, signed by the Solana Policy Institute among others, demonstrates a pattern of policy engagement and advocacy on behalf of the industry. There is no conflicting information across the provided sources. The combination of a direct primary source from a government authority and consistent reporting from multiple secondary sources provides high confidence that the statement is true.