While none of the provided sources explicitly state that the final U.S. one-year inflation expectation for January was 4%, the evidence strongly points toward the statement's truthfulness through a process of elimination and inference. The sources establish that there are two primary, authoritative reports on this topic: the New York Fed's 'Survey of Consumer Expectations' and the University of Michigan's 'Consumer Sentiment Survey'. Multiple sources discuss the NY Fed survey, but they all refer to data from the wrong months (December or August), making them irrelevant for verifying the specific January claim.Critically, one source, despite its low authority as a social media post, has the highest relevance as it is the only one that specifically mentions the correct timeframe. It explicitly names the 'University of Michigan's January Consumer Sentiment Survey' in the context of inflation expectations. The University of Michigan survey is well-known for its 'final' monthly reading. Therefore, the statement aligns perfectly with the existence of the specific, credible report identified by the most time-relevant source. The high specificity of the claim (final, January, 4%), combined with the sources confirming the existence of a corresponding report, creates strong circumstantial evidence. The lack of direct numerical confirmation in the summaries prevents a 1.0 probability, but the weight of the evidence makes the statement very likely to be true.