ESMA Flags Prediction Markets Over Insider Trading and EU Authorization Risks

  • ESMA warned prediction markets face insider-trading, investor-protection and EU authorization risks.
  • Nine linked accounts reportedly made about $2.4 million from Iran-related Polymarket bets and won 98% of the time.
  • Kalshi and Polymarket recorded quarterly volumes of $8.8 billion and $12 billion, respectively, while combined monthly volume reached $44.8 billion by June.

Prediction markets face intensified regulatory scrutiny after the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) warned that the sector is rife with insider trading and investor-protection risks. In a risk report published Thursday, September 10, ESMA said Polymarket and Kalshi do not hold authorizations required to sell event-based contracts in the European Union and questioned whether restrictions in some member states effectively limit access. The regulator cited bets linked to a February strike on Iran, the operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and alleged tampering with weather sensors used to settle Polymarket contracts. Newly created wallets reportedly made about $1.2 million from Iran-related bets placed hours before the strike, while Bubblemaps later traced nine linked accounts that made about $2.4 million and won 98% of the time. A US Army master sergeant involved in the Maduro raid pleaded not guilty to charges tied to more than $400,000 in Polymarket profits. ESMA said contracts linked to asset prices and political or sports outcomes may fall under EU financial-market rules depending on their characteristics, while financial-market, crypto and gambling rules restrict some contracts and their sale to retail investors. The platforms continue to expand elsewhere, with quarterly volumes of $8.8 billion for Kalshi and $12 billion for Polymarket, while combined monthly volume reached $44.8 billion by June. ESMA's broader report also flagged tokenized equities and decentralized-finance exploits as potential channels for spillovers between crypto and traditional finance, amid a US dispute over federal and state authority over event contracts.

The information on this website is generated using AI and we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Please use it as reference information only.