The Washington Post reported the company was raising funds in the United States while having no current employees in China, and said it planned to rename MiroThinker; MiroMind disputed that claim.
MiroMind denied a Washington Post report that said the company planned to rename MiroThinker to reduce perceived links to China. The report also said MiroMind was seeking funding in the United States and had no current employees in China. The dispute centers on corporate positioning and investor perception, an issue that can be significant for technology and crypto-related firms operating across multiple jurisdictions.