
A U.S. jury found OpenAI and Sam Altman not liable in Elon Musk’s case, while additional claims that OpenAI abandoned its charitable mission were dismissed as filed too late.
A U.S. jury in Oakland, California, rejected Elon Musk’s claims against OpenAI, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Microsoft after a three-week trial, and U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers agreed with the advisory jury’s conclusion that neither OpenAI nor Altman was liable. The judge also dismissed Musk’s breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment claims on statute-of-limitations grounds, finding they were brought too late. Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 and left its board in 2018, had argued that the organization was founded as a charitable AI lab and later improperly shifted toward a for-profit model under Altman. He said he contributed about $38 million and sought remedies including up to $134 billion in forfeited gains, removal of Altman and Brockman from leadership, and reversal of a 2025 restructuring. OpenAI argued Musk’s donations had no legally binding written restrictions and that restructuring was necessary to fund the high cost of advanced AI development. Musk’s lawyer said he still has the right to appeal.