
The former SEC and CFTC chair backed Ohio in a Sixth Circuit amicus brief, arguing Dodd-Frank was aimed at post-2008 derivatives regulation rather than sports-event contracts offered by Kalshi.
Gary Gensler, the former SEC and CFTC chair, filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Sixth Circuit backing Ohio and arguing that Dodd-Frank did not authorize the CFTC to regulate sports-related prediction markets. He said the 2010 law was designed to oversee complex financial derivatives after the 2008 financial crisis, not to place sports betting under exclusive federal oversight, and argued sports-event contracts should not be treated as swaps in a way that would let them bypass state gambling regulation. The filing opposes current CFTC Chair Michael Selig and Kalshi in litigation over Ohio’s order requiring Kalshi to stop offering sports event contracts, after a court denied Kalshi’s request for a preliminary injunction.