Back
Ethereum Foundation says it will not reorganize around ecosystem popularity

Ethereum Foundation says it will not reorganize around ecosystem popularity

The nonprofit completed a five-cluster reorganization, cut 54 roles and plans a roughly 40% budget reduction as debate intensifies over Ethereum’s long-term funding for core development and shared infrastructure.

ETH

Fact Check
Bastian Aue's primary statement (X @aerugoettinea, June 22, 2026) explicitly states the EF is NOT for 'ecosystem popularity' and details defensive priorities exactly matching the claim: censorship/capture resistance, privacy, security, preventing toxic MEV capture, and staking treated as protocol infrastructure resistant to intermediary (centralization) capture. The official Ethereum Foundation blog confirms Aue's role as interim Co-Executive Director, giving him authority to speak for the Foundation. Cryptopolitan and CoinDesk corroborate the surrounding context of leadership departures (Hsiao-Wei Wang, Tomasz Stańczak, and others) and funding concerns that fueled the debate. Every element of the claim is directly supported by the primary source and corroborated by secondary reporting.
Summary

The Ethereum Foundation said it will not remake itself to win broader ecosystem approval, even as it completes a five-cluster reorganization, eliminates 54 roles, or about 20% of staff, and plans to cut its budget by about 40%. The dispute has intensified broader debate over how Ethereum should finance core development after the foundation’s client incentive program expired in April 2026, with former contributor Trenton Van Epps warning of a potential “slow-burn funding crisis” within three to nine months for more than a dozen client, research and coordination teams needing about $30 million a year. At the same time, Kleros founder Clément Lesaege has proposed a research-stage Validator Redirected Revenue mechanism that would let validators signal redirecting 0% to 10% of staking rewards to an ecosystem fund, a proposal that has drawn criticism over lower yields, governance capture and validator cartelization.

Terms & Concepts
  • validator rewards: The yield earned by validators for helping secure a proof-of-stake network and process transactions.
  • multi-client approach: Using multiple software clients for resilience rather than depending on a single implementation.
  • free-rider problem: A funding challenge in which many participants benefit from shared resources without contributing to their costs.