Judge lets fraud and securities claims proceed against DCG over Genesis Yield

Judge lets fraud and securities claims proceed against DCG over Genesis Yield

A revised federal ruling revives common-law fraud claims against Barry Silbert and Digital Currency Group, keeps federal securities claims alive, and leaves some state consumer-protection claims dismissed or stayed.

Fact Check
Two independent contemporaneous sources dated July 6, 2026 (The Block and Crypto Briefing) confirm every element of the claim: a revised federal ruling revives a New York common-law fraud claim against Barry Silbert and DCG over Genesis Yield, keeps federal securities claims alive, and leaves state consumer-protection claims either dismissed (IL/KS/NV/TX) or stayed (CA/FL/NY). The Block explicitly notes the decision revises a February ruling, matching the 'revised ruling' framing. Prior CoinDesk coverage confirms the underlying litigation.
    Reference123
Summary

A Connecticut federal judge has revised an earlier decision in the Genesis Yield litigation, reviving investors' common-law fraud claims against Barry Silbert, Digital Currency Group and other defendants while allowing federal securities claims to continue. The case centers on allegations tied to a $1.1 billion promissory note used after the 2022 collapse of Three Arrows Capital, which investors say obscured Genesis Global Capital's true financial condition. Judge Stefan R. Underhill previously found that Genesis Yield qualifies as a security under the Howey and Reves tests, a conclusion that supports the federal securities claims and could have broader implications for crypto lending products that promise returns from platform-managed activity. The revised ruling changes part of the court's February decision, while some state consumer-protection claims were dismissed or stayed.

Terms & Concepts
  • promissory note: A written promise to repay a specified amount, often used as a debt instrument.
  • Howey test: A legal test used to determine whether an arrangement qualifies as an investment contract and therefore a security.
  • Reves test: A legal framework used to assess whether a note or similar instrument should be treated as a security.