
Ripple executives are now publicly urging Senate passage as lawmakers weigh ethics language, banking objections and a shrinking timeline before the Aug. 7 recess.
The Senate remains under pressure to advance the CLARITY Act before the Aug. 7 recess, with the White House pressing for action, law-enforcement and banking groups lobbying over specific provisions, and Ripple executives adding a new public push centered on consumer protection. Ripple’s global co-head of public policy and government, Lauren Belive, said on July 15 that opposing the bill would preserve regulatory uncertainty that leaves crypto holders exposed to bad actors, arguing that the same gaps seen in the FTX collapse remain unresolved. Ripple Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty echoed that warning, saying a vote against the measure would leave unregulated conditions in place to be exploited. The bill would create a federal framework for digital asset trading and issuance, divide oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and require regulatory oversight before tokens reach the market. Its path is still complicated by unresolved conflict-of-interest language tied to senior officials’ crypto interests, Senate vote math, disputes over stablecoin provisions and other drafting issues, even as supporters try to move it toward a floor vote during the current work period.