TDC sues Illinois to block digital asset tax law

TDC sues Illinois to block digital asset tax law

The crypto trade group is seeking to halt Illinois' planned 0.2% digital asset tax before its January 2027 start, arguing the levy unlawfully singles out blockchain-recorded activity and burdens brokers serving Illinois customers.

Fact Check
Multiple independent authoritative sources confirm the claim. CoinDesk (primary reporting) and The Block report that The Digital Chamber (TDC) sued Illinois over its digital asset tax. cryptonews.net references and links the actual lawsuit PDF filed July 21, 2026 against the Illinois Department of Revenue, detailing the 0.2% Digital Asset Tax Act and the constitutional/federal-preemption arguments seeking to block the tax before it takes effect. The Digital Chamber's own CEO, Cody Carbone, confirmed the suit on X. All elements of the claim—the litigant (TDC), the defendant (Illinois), the subject (digital asset tax), and the goal (block before it takes effect)—are corroborated.
Summary

TDC, also known as The Digital Chamber, has sued the Illinois Department of Revenue in Sangamon County court to stop the state's Digital Asset Tax Act from taking effect, arguing the 0.2% levy violates the Illinois constitution, the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act by taxing digital-asset activity differently based on the technology used to record it. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday on behalf of a trade group representing more than 250 member companies, seeks to block enforcement before the tax's planned January 1, 2027 start. Illinois enacted the measure through Senate Bill 3019 as part of its fiscal 2027 budget package, and state projections estimate it could raise about $60 million annually. The law applies to covered exchange, transfer and storage events handled by brokers whose customers' place of primary use is in Illinois, including entities based in the state or providing digital asset services with gross receipts above $100,000. The Digital Chamber argues the measure is the first state transaction-based levy of its kind on digital assets, discriminates against blockchain infrastructure while sparing functionally similar traditional systems, and could reach beyond crypto into other distributed-ledger-based services. The complaint asks the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, while a repeal bill, House Bill 5798, remains pending in the legislature.

Terms & Concepts
  • Internet Tax Freedom Act: A federal law that bars certain discriminatory state and local taxes on electronic commerce.
  • Commerce Clause: A constitutional provision that limits states from enacting laws that discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce.
  • distributed ledger: A shared digital recordkeeping system used to track transactions across multiple participants.