Banca d’Italia study finds USDC remittances lacked consistent cost edge in July 2026

Banca d’Italia study finds USDC remittances lacked consistent cost edge in July 2026

Tests across 10 Italy-linked corridors found costs ranged from 0.30% to 8.96%, with fast settlement depending largely on domestic instant-payment systems rather than the blockchain leg alone.

USDC

Fact Check
The primary Banca d'Italia paper (No. 86, July 2026) directly confirms the claim: costs ranged from 0.30% to nearly 9% (consistent with the 8.96% cited), tests spanned 10 Italy-linked corridors, there was no systematic cost advantage, and fast settlement (under 20 minutes) depended on domestic instant-payment systems like PIX and TIPS rather than the blockchain leg (which averaged only 0.4%). Cointelegraph and crypto.news corroborate these figures. The only minor discrepancy is the exact upper bound (8.96% vs 'nearly 9%'), which is fully consistent.
    Reference123
Summary

Banca d’Italia said a July 2026 study found stablecoin remittances did not consistently outperform traditional transfer services on either cost or speed. Researchers sent 200 USDC across 10 corridors linking Italy with Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates and Japan, and recorded total costs ranging from 0.30% to nearly 9%. The blockchain leg averaged 0.4%, but most costs came from exchange purchases, funding methods, withdrawals and foreign-exchange conversion, leading the authors to conclude there was “no systematic cost advantage” over traditional channels. Compared with Wise simulations for the same $200 amount, USDC was cheaper in three comparable routes and more expensive in four, underscoring that any savings were highly corridor-specific. Timing results also hinged on local banking infrastructure: routes using TIPS, Pix and Transferencias 3.0 settled in under 20 minutes, while South African corridors took one or two business days because fiat endpoints were slower. The study said stablecoin rails and domestic instant-payment systems worked as complements, not substitutes, and cautioned that its limited sample “cannot be readily generalized” across all providers or corridors.

Terms & Concepts
  • stablecoin remittances: Cross-border money transfers that use fiat-pegged digital tokens as the settlement asset.
  • onchain: Recorded and settled directly on a blockchain network.
  • off-ramp: The step where digital tokens are converted back into local fiat currency for bank withdrawal or spending.