
The Australian computer scientist said Bitcoin's base protocol should remain unchanged, while arguing the asset's shift from electronic cash to generational-wealth marketing misreads how market capitalization works.
Craig Wright has revived his critique of Bitcoin's governance model, arguing that the network's base protocol should remain permanently fixed and that innovation should be pushed to the application layer rather than introduced through developer-led upgrades. He said no developers, miners, exchanges, corporations or foundations should be able to rewrite Bitcoin's rules, contending that stable protocol design gives businesses a predictable environment for investment and competition. Wright also challenged Bitcoin's decentralization claims, saying the system has come to rely on a small group of developers while presenting itself as decentralized. In his view, decentralization means preventing anyone from changing the protocol, not letting stakeholders collectively steer it through periodic software changes. He argued that limits on transaction capacity, changes to consensus rules and the exclusion of dissenting views run against Bitcoin's original design. He also criticized Bitcoin's evolving investment pitch, saying its narrative has moved from electronic cash to digital gold, then store of value, and more recently to promises of generational wealth. Wright argued that a trillion-dollar asset cannot plausibly repeat the exponential returns of Bitcoin's earliest period and said market capitalization does not equal realizable wealth, because large-scale selling would push prices sharply lower.