New York seeks to block Kalshi, pursue triple alleged gains and $100,000 penalties

New York seeks to block Kalshi, pursue triple alleged gains and $100,000 penalties

A state petition in Manhattan seeks to stop what officials call unlicensed sports wagering, while a federal judge declined the CFTC’s bid to halt New York’s enforcement case for now.

Fact Check
The official NY AG verified petition (People v. KalshiEX LLC) directly confirms every element of the claim: it was filed July 31, 2026 in New York County (Manhattan) Supreme Court, seeks to halt Kalshi's unlicensed sports wagering via a permanent injunction, and requests three times respondent's gain under Penal Law 80.10 plus $100,000 per offer/attempt under Racing Law 1367(16)(a). The petition and Fortune both note Kalshi's federal-commodities preemption defense and prior court denials of injunctive relief. Independent corroboration from Fortune and CryptoSlate matches the primary document.
    Reference123
Summary

New York is continuing its case to stop prediction-market exchange Kalshi from offering what the state describes as unlicensed gambling contracts, after a federal judge rejected the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s emergency request to pause the state’s enforcement action. Judge Jed S. Rakoff denied the request without prejudice, finding the CFTC had not shown a strong likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, and said the agency may refile before Judge Victor Marrero by Aug. 7. The dispute centers on whether federal commodities law preempts New York gambling enforcement against event contracts tied to sports, elections and other outcomes. Attorney General Letitia James sued Kalshi last week, alleging the company operated an illegal and unlicensed gambling business. New York has separately sought a permanent block in Manhattan state court, customer and wager records, restitution, damages, disgorgement, prejudgment interest and costs, including three times Kalshi’s alleged gains and $100,000 for each unauthorized offer or attempted offer of sports wagering or mobile sports wagering within or from New York. Kalshi and the CFTC argue the contracts are derivatives subject to the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction, while New York regulators contend they are bets that fall under state gambling law. The fight follows a cease-and-desist order the New York State Gaming Commission sent to Kalshi in October 2025.

Terms & Concepts
  • Prediction-market exchange: A platform where users trade contracts tied to the outcome of future events.
  • Disgorgement: Repayment of profits that authorities allege were obtained unlawfully.
  • Derivatives: Financial contracts whose value is linked to an underlying asset, benchmark or event.