
States argue a forced-labor Section 301 case is being used to preserve broad import duties after February's IEEPA setback, while separate importer suits test the same tariff program.
A coalition of 25 Democratic-led states filed suit on the 3rd in the U.S. Court of International Trade seeking to block Trump's new Section 301 tariffs of 10% to 12.5% on 60 economies. The states say the so-called forced-labor case is a pretext for sweeping import taxes after the Supreme Court ruled in February that the administration could not use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose reciprocal and fentanyl-related tariffs. The complaint argues the administration skipped consultations, applied similar rates to economies with very different policy profiles and is stretching presidential tariff authority beyond what Section 301 allows. The case follows a 150-day 10% global tariff under Section 122 and separate importer suits from Burlap and Barrel and Collective Horology, which say country-specific findings were required. The White House says the tariffs are a lawful response to foreign practices that allow goods made with forced labor into U.S. commerce.