The assessment is "likely_true" with high confidence based on strong, corroborating evidence from multiple highly relevant sources. Two sources, one with high authority and one with lower authority, directly and explicitly support the key terms of the statement: an agreement involving the suspension of U.S. tariffs and Chinese export controls for a period of one year. A third source provides supporting context, identifying a delay in China's export controls as a central factor in negotiations, which lends plausibility to the reported deal.The main piece of conflicting evidence comes from the most authoritative source, which reports an agreement to suspend tariffs for only 90 days and makes no mention of export controls. While this source's authority is high, its report conflicts with the more detailed and consistent narrative presented by other sources that specifically address both the one-year timeline and the inclusion of export controls. Another piece of contradictory evidence, a social media post about potential new tariffs over fentanyl, has low relevance and likely refers to a separate political issue rather than negating the existence of this specific trade agreement. Overall, the weight of evidence strongly supports the statement. The direct corroboration on the specific one-year duration and the inclusion of both tariffs and controls from multiple sources outweighs the conflicting report of a shorter, more limited deal.