The evidence strongly suggests the statement is true. Multiple sources, described as reputable financial news outlets like Barron's and Kitco, consistently and independently point to a specific, authoritative primary source for this type of data: the Bank of America (BofA) "Flow Show" report. The existence of other primary data providers like EPFR, which specialize in tracking global fund flows, confirms that such data is meticulously monitored and reported weekly, adding to the plausibility of the claim. The specificity of the figure, "$140 billion," is characteristic of data sourced from a detailed financial report.The single piece of potentially contradictory evidence, a summary of a Reuters report with figures that "do not match," is insufficient to invalidate the claim. The summary lacks the necessary context to determine if the Reuters report was covering the exact same category (i.e., strictly global *passive* equity funds) and the same time period. The discrepancy could easily be explained by differences in methodology or scope. Therefore, the overwhelming weight of evidence pointing to a credible and widely-cited primary source makes the statement highly probable.