The evidence strongly indicates that the statement is true, although the phrasing "resuming shipments" is a simplification of a more nuanced policy change. The most direct and authoritative piece of evidence is the legal advisory from Arnold & Porter, which details a specific decision by the U.S. Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) to suspend enforcement of a trade rule for one year. The Commerce Department is part of the executive branch, and this action represents a loosening of regulations that would facilitate the import of relevant components, effectively allowing shipments to resume or increase.This core piece of evidence is corroborated by The Export Practitioner, a specialized trade publication that also reports on recent actions by the BIS. Furthermore, the political reaction from Senator Tom Cotton, calling for a crackdown on Chinese chips, indirectly supports the conclusion. Such a statement is often a reaction to a policy change that the official opposes, suggesting that an easing of restrictions has indeed occurred.While some sources express a contrary long-term policy goal, such as the House Select Committee's priority to *reduce* reliance on China, this does not invalidate the existence of a short-term measure to address the acute chip shortage crisis. The reports from CNBC and Reuters describe the severity of this crisis, providing the urgent context for why the administration would take such a step. The apparent conflict between long-term strategic goals and short-term economic necessities is a common feature of government policy. The most concrete evidence points to a specific, recent action that eases trade restrictions, making the statement that the White House is enabling the resumption of chip shipments likely true.