The assessment is 'likely_true' with high confidence based on strong circumstantial evidence from the most authoritative sources, even without a direct quote of the specific '10,000' figure in the provided summaries.The most critical piece of evidence is the FactSet Earnings Insight source. It is described as a 'primary source for quantitative analysis of S&P 500 earnings call transcripts and thematic trends like AI mentions,' with the highest possible authority and relevance scores (0.95). The statement in question is a precise, quantitative claim about AI mentions in earnings calls—exactly the kind of data FactSet is known for compiling and publishing in its 'Earnings Insight' reports. Therefore, the designated primary source is the definitive authority for this specific type of information.Further supporting this, The Daily Spark from Apollo Academy is noted to cite FactSet for its data on earnings seasons, confirming FactSet's role as the go-to source for this metric in financial reporting. Additionally, high-authority sources like BlackRock and CNBC, while not providing the specific number, corroborate the underlying premise that AI has become a dominant and market-moving theme for S&P 500 companies, making a dramatic increase in mentions plausible.There is no conflicting evidence among the sources. The lower-relevance sources simply do not address the specific claim, rather than contradicting it. The absence of the exact number in the summaries is a limitation, but the collective evidence strongly suggests that the statement is a factual finding originating from the primary FactSet report. The high authority of the source and the specificity of the claim make it very likely to be accurate.