The statement is assessed as 'likely_true' based on strong, direct evidence from multiple relevant sources, despite an apparent contradiction with a primary data source.The Crypto Briefing article serves as the most direct and relevant source, explicitly stating that Ethereum and Bitcoin ETFs recorded a $508 million weekly outflow, which was the third-largest on record. This directly supports all components of the claim. This figure is corroborated by another independent news source, ValueTheMarkets, and is further amplified by news aggregators like FXEmpire, indicating the story has been widely reported.A potential point of conflict arises from the CoinShares report, a highly authoritative primary source, which cites a smaller weekly outflow of US$360 million. However, this figure is for all 'digital asset products' combined, not just for Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs specifically. The discrepancy can be logically reconciled: it is plausible that Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs experienced a $508 million outflow, while other digital asset investment products (e.g., Solana, multi-asset funds) saw inflows, resulting in a smaller net total outflow of $360 million for the entire sector. Therefore, the CoinShares report does not directly contradict the specific claim about Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, but rather reports on a different, broader scope.Other provided sources were either irrelevant (data on gold, money market funds, or general industry outlooks) or served only to confirm the existence of the primary news reports. Given that multiple sources directly support the specific claim and the conflicting data can be reasonably explained by a difference in scope, the statement is considered highly likely to be true.