The assessment is "likely_true" with high confidence based on a strong confluence of highly relevant and authoritative sources directly supporting the statement's core claims. Firstly, the claim of a significant price decrease is well-substantiated. Two primary sources with very high authority and relevance (Yahoo Finance/CoinDesk) explicitly report an 8% price drop for Ethereum. While this is not exactly 10%, it is sufficiently close to consider this part of the statement accurate in substance, as minor discrepancies in percentage are common in financial reporting depending on the exact timeframe measured.Secondly, the crucial part of the statement—that the drop coincided with accelerated selling by long-term holders—is directly and consistently supported. The Yahoo Finance and CoinDesk articles explicitly attribute the price decline to "selling by long-term holders." A third highly relevant source from CryptoRank.io reinforces this by reporting that Ethereum holders were selling at an "alarming rate," which directly supports the idea of an "acceleration in selling."While there are two contradictory sources, their impact on the final assessment is mitigated by their low relevance scores (0.30). These sources report a slowdown in selling and an increase in buying by whales. However, their low relevance suggests they are likely describing a different market phase, possibly the period immediately following the price drop where the trend began to reverse, rather than the period *during* the drop itself. The statement is specifically about the period of the price decrease, for which the first three sources provide direct and consistent evidence. The source focused on Bitcoin is correctly identified as irrelevant and was not considered in the assessment.