The assessment that the statement is 'likely_true' is based on strong, direct, and consistent evidence from multiple credible sources, with no conflicting information provided.Three separate sources with high relevance directly corroborate the statement. The financial news article from BNP Paribas provides the most explicit and quantitative support, stating that the market-implied probability for a Fed rate cut at the December meeting dropped significantly from 70% to 51% within a week. The CEIC article further reinforces this by citing the CME FedWatch tool and noting a 'growing probability that the Fed would hold rates steady,' which is functionally equivalent to a decreasing probability of a rate cut. Finally, the post from the Chief Investment Strategist at Briefing.com includes a direct screenshot of the CME FedWatch Tool, offering visual confirmation of the probabilities being discussed.This direct evidence is contextually supported by the existence of high-authority primary sources from the Federal Reserve itself, such as a speech by Governor Waller and the minutes from an FOMC meeting. These documents are the primary drivers of market expectations and provide a plausible cause for the shift in probabilities observed in the FedWatch tool. While the specific hawkish or dovish tilt of these documents isn't detailed in the summaries, their release is the type of event that would trigger such a repricing in the market.In summary, the direct evidence from financial analysis and reporting is unanimous and specific, and it aligns with the expected market impact of the provided high-authority Federal Reserve communications. The lack of any contradictory evidence results in a high confidence level in the truthfulness of the statement.