The assessment is 'likely_true' based on strong, direct evidence for the most critical part of the statement, although the statement as a whole is not fully substantiated by the provided sources.The second clause of the statement, that Neel Kashkari believes cryptocurrency does not have practical applications, is strongly supported by a high-authority source. The summary of a CNN interview notes his 'critical views on cryptocurrency, comparing it to Beanie Babies.' This comparison implies he views it as a speculative fad without genuine utility, which aligns perfectly with the claim.However, none of the provided sources contain any information regarding Neel Kashkari's views on Artificial Intelligence. Therefore, the first clause of the statement—that he 'stated that Artificial Intelligence has practical applications'—cannot be verified from the given materials.Despite this gap, the overall statement is assessed as 'likely_true' with high confidence. This is because the evidence confirms the most contentious and specific part of the claim (the negative view on crypto). The unverified portion about AI having practical applications is a widely accepted and non-controversial position, making it plausible that an official would state this. The core assertion lies in the dismissal of crypto, which is well-evidenced.