The assessment is based on the strong credibility of the primary source, Arkham Intelligence, a blockchain analytics firm with very high authority (0.95) on this matter. The claim originates directly from their research. A secondary source, a crypto news article, corroborates the event and correctly attributes the findings to Arkham Intelligence, reinforcing the core claim. There is one source presenting conflicting information, reporting a wildly inaccurate value of $13.3 billion. However, this source's credibility is undermined by the sheer improbability of the figure and its promotional nature, suggesting it is a result of poor reporting or a significant error rather than valid counter-evidence. Other provided sources are either educational in nature or entirely irrelevant to the specific claim and are therefore disregarded.The only minor ambiguity comes from the summary of the primary source, which mentions a larger movement of over $250M, while the statement specifies a $105M transaction. It is highly plausible that the $105M transfer was one part of the larger series of movements identified by Arkham. Given that the originator of the data is the most credible source available, and it is supported by secondary reporting, the statement is very likely to be true.