The evidence from multiple high-authority and highly relevant sources overwhelmingly supports the likelihood of two or more dissenting votes. There are no contradictions among the relevant sources provided.Several sources explicitly forecast multiple dissents. A Morningstar analysis states to 'Expect Dissent,' describing the committee as 'fractured.' A Reuters article discusses the potential for a 'flurry of Fed dissents in coming meetings,' and a market commentary from SouthState Bank notes the difficulty of 'forging a consensus' and mentions the likelihood of 'dissenting votes' in the plural. This language strongly suggests more than a single dissent.Furthermore, there is a strong recent precedent for this outcome. A New York Times article provides a direct account of a recent meeting where 'two governors dissented,' establishing that multiple dissents are a current feature of the committee's dynamics. The existence of a Kalshi prediction market, where traders bet on the specific number of dissents, provides a quantitative, market-based indicator that this is a highly plausible and actively debated outcome. The combination of direct expert analysis, recent historical precedent, and market-based indicators creates a strong, consistent case for the statement being true.