
Paradigm’s data head raised concerns over double-counted Polymarket volumes, prompting debate about third-party dashboard inaccuracies and potential competitive bias within the crypto prediction market space.
On Dec. 9, Paradigm’s data head claimed Polymarket’s reported trading volume is inflated due to double counting, leading to accusations of competitive bias from members of the crypto community. Representatives from Bankr and Dragonfly countered that the data discrepancies originate from third-party dashboards rather than Polymarket itself. The dispute underscores ongoing tensions between prediction market stakeholders over data accuracy and industry competition.