The evidence provided strongly supports the statement. There is a consistent and multi-faceted case for future U.S. investment in Venezuela's oil sector following a change in leadership.First, there is clear, stated intent from the highest levels of the U.S. government. Multiple high-authority news outlets, including The Guardian and Axios, report direct quotes from the U.S. President stating the U.S. will be "strongly involved" and "very strongly involved" in Venezuela's oil industry after a regime change. This provides a direct link between the political event (Maduro's removal) and the economic outcome (U.S. involvement in the oil sector).Second, the economic rationale is well-established. A BBC analysis highlights the severe underinvestment in Venezuela's state oil company, creating a clear need for massive foreign capital to rebuild the industry. Revitalizing a national oil sector of this scale would almost certainly require an investment in the "billions of dollars."Third, there is a demonstrated, existing interest from U.S. oil firms. A Euronews report explains that a major U.S. firm, Chevron, is already operating in Venezuela under special authorization despite sanctions. This pre-existing foothold makes it highly probable that Chevron and other firms would rapidly scale up their operations and investment once sanctions, detailed by the U.S. Treasury, are lifted. Finally, the sources indicate that access to oil is a central theme in the U.S.-Venezuela relationship. Reports from Argus Media detail offers from the Maduro government for an "oil deal" with the U.S., showing that oil access is a key bargaining chip that a post-Maduro government would likely use to attract U.S. support and investment. While a small portion of the sources have lower authority or are secondary analyses, the core evidence from official government sources and high-quality news reports is consistent and points directly to the likelihood of the statement being true.