The assessment hinges on the strength and relevance of the primary sources. The most authoritative and relevant source provided is Lookonchain, a blockchain analytics firm specializing in tracking and reporting significant on-chain transactions. With an authority of 0.90 and a relevance of 0.95, this source is considered the gold standard for verifying the claim and provides strong, direct evidence that the transaction occurred.While other sources mention the exact figure of '$10.87M', they do so in entirely different and unrelated contexts. The Binance price pages for THORWallet (TITN) and BNBTiger cite this figure as a market cap and total supply value, respectively. However, these sources have very low relevance scores (0.20 and 0.10), indicating that the matching number is likely a coincidence and does not contradict the primary claim about a Solana withdrawal. They do not state that the SOL withdrawal did *not* happen; they are simply irrelevant to it.The remaining sources are either completely off-topic (e.g., OpenAI, general market analysis) or discuss different transactions involving other cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin) or transaction types (deposits). None of the provided sources directly refute the claim. Therefore, based on the single, highly credible, and directly relevant source specializing in this type of data, the statement is assessed as likely true with high confidence.