The statement makes two distinct claims: 1) that the U.S. Nonfarm Payrolls (NFP) data for October and November were revised to a lower number, and 2) that the job growth figure reported for December was below consensus forecasts. The most authoritative and relevant sources provided, specifically the data aggregator pages for U.S. Nonfarm Payrolls and the economic calendar, are designed to provide exactly this type of information.These primary sources confirm both parts of the statement. They show that the actual NFP number reported for December was lower than the consensus forecast figure. Financial news articles previewing the report further corroborate the consensus forecast number, validating the comparison. The data aggregators also explicitly detail the revisions to previous months' data, confirming that the figures for both October and November were indeed revised downwards from their initial publication.The other sources are largely irrelevant to the national U.S. NFP data. Several sources deal with state-level employment data (New Jersey, Maine) or different national economic indicators (weekly unemployment claims, productivity), and therefore do not contradict the evidence from the primary sources. Since the most credible and relevant sources directly and consistently support both claims in the statement, the statement is assessed as likely true with high confidence.