The assessment of the statement is based on strong corroborating evidence and the absence of any contradictions. Although the primary source, the official Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) 'Employment Situation' report for December, is not provided, other highly relevant sources allow for a high-confidence inference.The most significant piece of evidence is the ADP National Employment Report. This is a reputable industry report that measures private sector job growth, a major component of the total nonfarm payrolls figure cited in the statement. The ADP report states that private sector employment increased by 41,000 jobs in December. The statement claims total nonfarm payrolls (which includes private sector and government jobs) increased by 50,000. The 9,000-job difference is a plausible figure for government job growth, making the payrolls part of the statement highly consistent with this reliable, independent data source. A news article from CNBC further corroborates the ADP figure.Regarding the 4.4% unemployment rate, no provided source directly confirms or denies this number. However, none of the sources, including those from the BLS, the Department of Labor, or the Federal Reserve, offer any conflicting data. The ADP report mentions that annual pay was up 4.4%, which is a different metric but a notable numerical coincidence. In the absence of contradictory information and given the strong support for the payrolls number, the unemployment rate figure is considered plausible.In summary, while direct verification is impossible without the primary BLS report, the payrolls number is strongly supported by a reliable proxy (ADP), and there is no evidence to dispute the unemployment rate. Therefore, the statement is assessed as likely true with a high degree of confidence.