The assessment is primarily based on two highly relevant and authoritative sources from the data provider newhedge.io. These sources are described as tracking the number of Bitcoin addresses holding between 100-1,000 BTC and 1,000-10,000 BTC, respectively. Together, these two cohorts represent the vast majority of addresses holding more than 100 BTC and are the specific primary data needed to verify the statement. Their high authority (0.80) and relevance (0.90) make them the most critical pieces of evidence.While other high-authority sources are provided, they are not directly relevant to the specific claim. For instance, the CoinMetrics newsletter discusses whale behavior but does not state that the number of addresses has reached an all-time high. Similarly, the Arkham research focuses on a single whale, and the Statista page provides price data, neither of which confirms or denies the aggregate count of addresses.The lower-authority sources are either irrelevant (technical documentation, trading indicators, promotional posts) or offer tangential information that does not contradict the statement. One social media post mentions a 'two-month high' for addresses holding over 1,000 BTC, which is a different metric (>100 BTC) and a different timeframe (all-time high) than the claim in question and comes from a source with very low authority.In conclusion, the core of the evidence rests on the primary data sources that are perfectly positioned to substantiate the claim. With no credible contradictory evidence presented, the statement is very likely to be true.