The assessment that the statement is 'likely_true' is based on strong, direct evidence provided by one of the sources. A Facebook post by the crypto news outlet Cryptopolitan, which has high relevance to the topic, directly reports that "Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the White House has not withdrawn its support for the CLARITY Act." This assertion is functionally equivalent to denying that the White House is discontent with the legislation.Further lending credibility to this primary evidence, other sources provide the necessary context for why such a denial would be made. A post on X by Pippa Malmgren and a post on Stocktwits both claim that the White House was indeed considering pulling its support for a crypto bill. These sources establish the existence of a rumor or concern that Armstrong would have a reason to address. While they contradict the content of Armstrong's alleged statement, they do not contradict the fact that he made the denial itself.The remaining sources are either not relevant or have very low authority. The Forbes article discusses Armstrong rejecting a different bill, and the article on the university athletics website has extremely low authority. There is no credible evidence that directly contradicts the claim that Armstrong made the denial. The primary evidence is direct and unambiguous, making the statement very likely to be true.