The assessment of 'likely_true' is based on strong, direct evidence supporting the core of the statement, while the contradictory evidence is indirect and circumstantial. The statement makes two key claims: 1) Donald Trump praised Kevin Hassett's media appearances, and 2) he stated Hassett would remain in his current position.The first claim is directly and explicitly confirmed by a high-authority source, Reuters, which states, 'U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday praised economic adviser Kevin Hassett.' This provides a solid foundation for the statement's truthfulness.The second claim is where nuance is introduced. Several other high-authority sources (Politico, CNBC, Yahoo Finance) report that Trump was wavering or hesitant about considering Hassett for a different, future role as Federal Reserve chairman. However, being hesitant about a major promotion does not directly contradict a desire for an adviser to remain in their *current* position. An official can be seen as effective in their role without being considered the top candidate for a different one. Therefore, this evidence weakens, but does not disprove, the second part of the statement.Given that the most significant part of the statement (the praise) is directly confirmed by a primary source, and the counter-evidence does not create a direct contradiction, the overall statement is very likely to be true.