The assessment is "likely_true" because the foundational elements of the statement are overwhelmingly confirmed by multiple high-authority sources, and the most specific claim is directly supported by one source without any direct contradiction from others.First, the existence of a Supreme Court hearing concerning an effort by Donald Trump to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook is well-established. Highly authoritative sources like SCOTUSblog, USA Today, Fox Business, and Business Insider all confirm that the court is scheduled to hear this specific case.Second, the central and most specific claim—that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is scheduled to attend this hearing—is explicitly stated by one source. A social media post from local news affiliate KCCI directly reports that Powell will attend the oral arguments. While this source has a relatively low authority score (0.60), its relevance is perfect (1.00) as it addresses the exact claim in the statement.Crucially, no other source contradicts this specific claim. While more authoritative outlets like SCOTUSblog and USA Today do not mention Powell's attendance, their silence is not a direct refutation. The other sources that mention Powell do so in completely separate contexts (congressional testimony, a DOJ probe), which neither supports nor denies his attendance at the court hearing.Therefore, based on the available evidence, we have a single, direct, and uncontradicted piece of evidence supporting the full statement, built upon a foundation of facts confirmed by multiple highly credible sources. This combination makes the statement likely true with a high degree of confidence.