The statement is strongly supported by a consensus across multiple high-authority primary sources. The core claims are (1) US markets fell, (2) precious metals hit record highs, and (3) this was caused by concern over US tariffs on Greenland.Evidence for precious metals hitting record highs is overwhelming and consistent. Sources from CNBC, Reuters, The Guardian, MSN, and Barron's all explicitly state that gold and silver reached record or near-record levels. Evidence for the cause is also exceptionally strong. Every news source provided directly attributes the market movements, particularly the 'safe-haven rally' in precious metals, to the news and investor concern surrounding potential US tariffs on Greenland. This is further corroborated by primary government sources from a Senate Committee and a Congressman, which confirm the existence and controversial nature of the proposed policy.The claim that 'US markets fell' is generally supported, though with a minor complication. Reports from The Guardian and Barron's mention 'world stock markets' or 'global stocks' facing turbulence and sliding, which would include the US. However, one source (MSN) notes that US stock markets were closed for a holiday on a specific day during this period. This does not falsify the claim, as the statement refers to 'a period of concern,' not a single day. The negative sentiment in global markets strongly suggests a decline in US market values and futures during that timeframe, even if the cash market was temporarily closed. Given the strong, consistent evidence for the precious metals rally and its cause, and substantial evidence for a negative impact on equity markets, the statement is assessed as likely true. The slight ambiguity about the precise timing of the US market fall prevents a higher truth probability, but the overall weight of evidence is convincing.