The statement's core claims—that prosecutors in Shenzhen charged 30 individuals in the Ding Yifeng case—are overwhelmingly supported by multiple, highly authoritative primary sources, including China's official state news agency Xinhua and the People's Daily Online. These top-tier sources explicitly confirm that the Shenzhen People's Procuratorate has prosecuted 30 core members of Ding Yifeng.Some sources report a total of 80 individuals being prosecuted. However, this apparent contradiction is resolved by other sources, such as the National Business Daily, which clarify that the main Shenzhen Municipal People's Procuratorate charged the 30 core individuals, while other district-level prosecutors handled the remaining cases, bringing the total to 80. This makes the specific claim about 30 individuals being charged by Shenzhen prosecutors accurate.The only point of contention is the characterization of the case as a "crypto fundraising case." None of the highly authoritative Chinese state or financial news sources (Xinhua, People's Daily, Securities Times, etc.) mention "crypto." They consistently describe the charges as "fundraising fraud" and "illegally absorbing public deposits." Two sources explicitly note the absence of any mention of crypto in the official announcements.Because the fundamental facts of the statement (the prosecuting body, the number of individuals, and the specific case) are verifiably true, the statement is assessed as "likely_true". The inaccuracy lies in the unsubstantiated descriptor "crypto," which prevents a full 1.0 truth probability but does not invalidate the central assertion of the statement.