The assessment is "likely_true" with high confidence based on strong, corroborating evidence from multiple high-relevance sources.The statement makes a specific claim about the "odds" of a shutdown reaching a "record high." The Kalshi prediction market is a primary source that directly quantifies the perceived "odds" of such an event, confirming that this is a measurable metric. While this source doesn't specify if a record was hit, it validates the core premise that trackable "odds" exist.The most compelling evidence comes from the source citing a Pew Research poll. It explicitly states that "public anger at the federal government reached a record high in the days leading up to a shutdown." Public sentiment, particularly record-high anger, is a major driver of political events and is strongly correlated with the perceived probability or "odds" of a political stalemate like a shutdown. This primary data point directly supports the "record high" component of the statement in the specific context of an impending shutdown.Additional sources, such as the Bank of America market outlook, confirm that a federal government shutdown was a significant event being closely watched, which provides context for why its odds would be tracked and scrutinized.There is no contradictory evidence presented. The remaining sources are largely irrelevant, discussing the economic impact of a shutdown or mentioning unrelated record highs (e.g., corn production, empty office space), and therefore do not weaken the claim. The combination of a source establishing a mechanism for tracking "odds" and a separate primary source confirming a related metric reached a "record high" provides a strong foundation for the statement's truthfulness.