The evidence provided strongly supports the truthfulness of the statement, primarily through high-authority sources that establish a credible context and a standard procedure for such a denial. Although none of the sources contain the verbatim text of the denial, they collectively build a compelling circumstantial case. One highly authoritative source points out that the Securities Times' 'Clarifications and Risk Warnings' section is the official platform for a listed company like Kweichow Moutai to issue such a statement, confirming the standard procedure for this type of corporate action. Another key source, a major Chinese financial portal, shows that Kweichow Moutai and a SpaceX funding round were being discussed concurrently, which establishes a plausible motive for a rumor to start and for the company to issue a clarification. Furthermore, other provided articles demonstrate that it is common for Chinese companies to issue clarification announcements regarding their involvement in specific industries, reinforcing the plausibility of the event.The sources with low relevance do not contradict the claim; they simply lack information connecting the two entities, which is not evidence of absence. There are no direct contradictions among the sources. The high authority and relevance of the supporting evidence, combined with the clear motive and established corporate procedure, make it highly likely that Kweichow Moutai did issue a statement denying involvement.