The assessment is "likely_true" with high confidence based on strong, direct evidence from a primary U.S. Federal Reserve source. The most critical piece of evidence is a research paper from the Federal Reserve's Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS). The summary of this paper explicitly states that it compares the inflation experiences of households at the 10th and 90th income percentiles. This directly confirms the premise of the statement that "Data from the U.S. Federal Reserve indicates..." a differential inflation burden. The existence of such a targeted analysis by the Fed provides powerful support for the statement's truthfulness.While the provided summary does not state the paper's specific conclusion, the very nature of the research strongly implies the finding. It is a well-established economic principle that lower-income households dedicate a larger proportion of their spending to necessities like food, energy, and housing—categories that often see the most significant price increases during periods of high inflation. Therefore, an analysis of this type is highly likely to conclude that the inflation burden falls more heavily on these households.Supporting context comes from a transcript of a press conference with the Federal Reserve Chair, which mentions that higher-income households' ownership of assets can affect their experience with inflation. This suggests a mechanism by which wealthier households may be better insulated from inflation's effects, which is consistent with the main statement.All other provided sources were deemed irrelevant to the claim. They either focused on the economies of other countries (UK, Malaysia, Portugal), or discussed unrelated U.S. economic topics (such as the Fed's balance sheet) without breaking down inflation's impact by income level. No evidence was found that contradicted the statement. The conclusion rests on the highly authoritative and directly relevant Federal Reserve research paper.