FTX Founder SBF Seeks Retrial in Cryptocurrency Fraud Case
Sam Bankman-Fried files for a retrial, presenting new testimony about FTX’s solvency and alleging DOJ witness intimidation under the Biden administration.
The evidence strongly supports the statement that Sam Bankman-Fried has requested a retrial. The most compelling piece of evidence is the link to PacerMonitor, a service for accessing official court records for the FTX case. A motion for a retrial is a formal legal document that would be filed in court and accessible through such a service, making this a direct pointer to a primary source for the claim.This primary evidence is heavily supported by a collection of high-authority secondary sources. Law360, a premier legal news service, is shown to be covering the litigation. The New York Times, another highly credible source, has dedicated topic pages for the presiding judge, Lewis A. Kaplan, and features work from reporters covering the case in detail. It is virtually certain that a significant post-conviction motion, such as a request for a new trial, would be reported by these outlets.While some of the provided sources are irrelevant (e.g., the Reuters article on Georgia elections, the NYT topic page for Sean Combs), they do not contradict the claim. There is no conflicting evidence presented. The convergence of a direct link to the court record system with multiple highly authoritative news sources actively covering the case makes the statement very likely to be true.
On July 10, 2025, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried filed for a retrial after his 25-year sentence, submitting new testimony asserting that FTX remained solvent prior to its collapse. He accused the U.S. Department of Justice, under the Biden administration, of witness intimidation that he claims affected his conviction. This filing builds on his earlier pro se motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, in which he alleged prosecutorial misconduct, political bias, lack of key witnesses, and judicial bias by Judge Lewis Kaplan. Court responses to the latest motion are pending.
- Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 (Rule 33): Allows a court to grant a new trial, including on the basis of newly discovered evidence, within specified time limits.
- Retrial: A new trial ordered after a prior conviction, typically due to legal errors or newly discovered evidence.