The claim is strongly supported by the official SEC press release 'SEC Announces Enforcement Results for Fiscal Year 2025.' That source explicitly states that seven crypto firm registration-related cases and six 'definition of a dealer' cases 'identified no direct investor harm' and 'produced no investor benefit or protection,' and that the current Commission views them as reflecting 'a misinterpretation of the federal securities laws.' The same SEC source also says the Commission has 'deliberately refocused the enforcement program on matters of fraud' and highlights market manipulation among the priority harms. This directly matches the statement that the SEC says some earlier crypto cases misread securities law and did not directly protect investors, while shifting focus toward fraud and market manipulation. Cointelegraph's 'SEC admits certain crypto enforcement cases delivered no investor benefit' and crypto.news' 'SEC says some of its past crypto enforcement cases misinterpreted securities laws' both independently restate the same points from the SEC release, providing corroboration. The only slight caveat is that the SEC statement speaks for the 'current Commission' rather than phrasing every point personally as a quote from Chair Paul Atkins, though both secondary reports connect the shift to his chairmanship.